May 7, 1958
Code Message No. 4802 from Deputy Minister Winiewicz to Michałowski (New York) and Milnikiel (London)
This document was made possible with support from Carnegie Corporation of New York (CCNY)
146
May 7, code message of deputy minister Winiewicz to the permanent representative
at the UN in New York and the ambassador in London regarding further diplomatic action
in relation to the Rapacki Plan
Warsaw, May 7, 1958
cFlash – Deliver immediatelyc
CODE MESSAGE [NO] c4802, May 7, 20.30 hrsc
Michałowski – New York
Milnikiel – London
We instruct Sieradzki and our ambassadors in Oslo and Copenhagen to conduct cunofficial, probingc conversations with the local MoFA, so that the eventual reply of specific countries to the Rapacki Plan made a better impression than the American reply,1[1]5 particularly so that it would not reject the Plan a limine. In the conversations they should guide themselves, among others, by the following arguments:
1) We do not believe that the American reply, although it is – generally speaking – negative, cancels our reply. We shall give a written reply, because we uphold the Plan and intend to continue international discussion about it.
2) It is not our intention to propose the Rapacki Plan as a panaceum for all international problems. Rather, the Plan is an introduction to general disarmament and contributes to a better atmosphere for solving other problems. It seems that the American note does not take that (as well as some other aspects of the Rapacki Plan, e.g. [the issue of] conventional weapons control) into consideration.
3) A better form of reply than the American form would be, e.g. to submit to Poland questions and hdemandshcrequestc for explanation of those aspects of the Plan that they consider unclear or raise some doubts.
We ask you to act in this direction via such channels that you will deem appropriate.
fWiniewiczf
AMSZ, ZD 6/77, w. 59, t. 829
15 See doc. no 142.
Deputy Minister Winiewicz writes to Michałowski and Milnikiel to inform them of further diplomatic instructions regarding the Rapacki Plan. He has advised ambassadors that the negative American reply does not mean the Plan will halt, and that other foreign representatives should be encouraged to submit perceived problems with the Plan to Poland.
Author(s):
Associated Places
Associated Topics
Subjects Discussed
Document Information
Source
Original Archive
Rights
The History and Public Policy Program welcomes reuse of Digital Archive materials for research and educational purposes. Some documents may be subject to copyright, which is retained by the rights holders in accordance with US and international copyright laws. When possible, rights holders have been contacted for permission to reproduce their materials.
To enquire about this document's rights status or request permission for commercial use, please contact the History and Public Policy Program at HAPP@wilsoncenter.org.