Skip to content

1964

Report, 'Note on the views of the Dutch Government on disarmament'

This document was made possible with support from Carnegie Corporation of New York (CCNY)

Disarmament Unit

 

Ministry of External Affairs

 

Title: Note on the views of the Dutch Government on disarmament

 

Mr. Luns, the Foreign Minister, said that important as disarmament might be or the abolition of war as a means of foreign policy did not automatically mean peace. Political contrasts might become sharper when weapons were abolished.

 

2. He pointed out that the Western aim was a world in which nations and peoples could live and cooperate in peace and freedom and in which war will be eliminated as an instrument to national policy. To realize this aim general and complete disarmament under efficient international control will be necessary. He stressed that the urgency of reaching an agreement on general and complete disarmament should not however jeopardize efforts to reach agreement on restricted disarmament measures. But such agreements were acceptable only if they did not disturb the existing balance of power or violate or prejudice the possibilities to solve important political problems, as Germany and Berlin. He Western countries have thus far rejected proposals of a regional disarmament in Europe because they were contrary to the principle that the establishment of denuclearized zones should not disturb the balance of power.

 

3. The Foreign Minister said that the Dutch Government were prepared to investigate “in a positive spirit” the possibilities of an exchange of fixed observation posts on both sides of the demarcation line in Europe as a part of a “thinning out” of armed forces. Holland would welcome a controlled denuclearization of Africa and Latin America. It had, however, “serious reservations” as to a non-aggression treaty between the powers of NATO and the Warsaw Pact, because such a treaty would help to formalize the division of Germany. “Important progress” in the solution of the German Problem and genuine disarmament would have to be made before a non-aggression treaty could be of any actual importance. The Dutch Government was however prepared to consider the possibility of making reciprocal non-aggression declarations.

 

4. The Dutch Government, which has always strongly supported a general and complete disarmament agreement, trusted that the Geneva Disarmament Conference would make “constant, though possibly slow,” progress to that end.

 

The Dutch government contends that an agreement on general and complete disarmament must be proceeded under the existing balance of power

Author(s):


Document Information

Source

File No. U.IV/2540/11/1964. Dutch Government’s Views on Disarmament – Received through Indian Ambassador in the Hague. Obtained by Ryan Musto.

Original Archive

Rights

The History and Public Policy Program welcomes reuse of Digital Archive materials for research and educational purposes. Some documents may be subject to copyright, which is retained by the rights holders in accordance with US and international copyright laws. When possible, rights holders have been contacted for permission to reproduce their materials.

To enquire about this document's rights status or request permission for commercial use, please contact the History and Public Policy Program at HAPP@wilsoncenter.org.

Original Uploaded Date

2016-04-27

Type

Report

Language

Record ID

123923

Donors

Carnegie Corporation of New York (CCNY)