April 12, 1967
Intelligence Note from Thomas L. Hughes to the Acting Secretary, 'Soviets Continue to Denounce American Interpretation of Nonproliferation Treaty'
This document was made possible with support from Carnegie Corporation of New York (CCNY)
The Soviets were insisting that article III on safeguards mention only the IAEA but not the European Atomic Energy Community [EURATOM], even though West Germany and other EURATOM members resisted the idea of IAEA inspections in Western Europe. It would take quite a few months before the Article III wording was to everyone’s satisfaction, but the Soviets also objected to US interpretations of the proposed Article II which would permit a nuclear-armed, united Western Europe.
Associated Places
Associated Topics
Document Information
Source
Original Archive
Rights
The History and Public Policy Program welcomes reuse of Digital Archive materials for research and educational purposes. Some documents may be subject to copyright, which is retained by the rights holders in accordance with US and international copyright laws. When possible, rights holders have been contacted for permission to reproduce their materials.
To enquire about this document's rights status or request permission for commercial use, please contact the History and Public Policy Program at HAPP@wilsoncenter.org.
Original Uploaded Date
Type
Language
Record ID
Original Classification
Secret
Donors
Explore Related Resources
Questions Pondered by State Department Intelligence in Recently Declassified Reports from the 1960s
Declassified State Department intelligence reports illuminate a range of important questions about nuclear weapons in world politics during the 1950s and 1960s.
Will China Help Pakistan Get the Bomb? Will Sweden Go Nuclear? Does West Germany Want to Scuttle the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty?
Declassified State Department intelligence reports illuminate a range of important questions about nuclear weapons in world politics during the 1950s and 1960s, including whether new nuclear weapons states would raise the risks of nuclear proliferation.