March 3, 1967
Research Memorandum REU-14 from Thomas L. Hughes to the Secretary, 'How Major NATO Countries View the Prospect of an ABM Deployment'
This document was made possible with support from Carnegie Corporation of New York (CCNY)
Despite new information that the Soviet Union was deploying anti-ballistic missile defenses around Moscow, the United States had not yet decided to deploy its own ABM defenses (although a decision would be made later in the year) and there was some hope that U.S.-Soviet talks would prevent an ABM race. If, however, talks failed, some NATO allies worried about the “adverse consequences” of an ABM race, especially whether having an ABM system might incline Washington toward risk taking.
Associated Places
Associated Topics
Document Information
Source
Original Archive
Rights
The History and Public Policy Program welcomes reuse of Digital Archive materials for research and educational purposes. Some documents may be subject to copyright, which is retained by the rights holders in accordance with US and international copyright laws. When possible, rights holders have been contacted for permission to reproduce their materials.
To enquire about this document's rights status or request permission for commercial use, please contact the History and Public Policy Program at HAPP@wilsoncenter.org.
Original Uploaded Date
Type
Language
Record ID
Original Classification
Secret
Donors
Explore Related Resources
Questions Pondered by State Department Intelligence in Recently Declassified Reports from the 1960s
Declassified State Department intelligence reports illuminate a range of important questions about nuclear weapons in world politics during the 1950s and 1960s.
Will China Help Pakistan Get the Bomb? Will Sweden Go Nuclear? Does West Germany Want to Scuttle the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty?
Declassified State Department intelligence reports illuminate a range of important questions about nuclear weapons in world politics during the 1950s and 1960s, including whether new nuclear weapons states would raise the risks of nuclear proliferation.